Latest news

—-

Menu

To buy-in or not to buy-in, that’s the question

  • 14 June, 2024

Industry says no to progressive settlement fail penalties

  • 6 March, 2024

ECSDA: Aim for good enough, not perfection, in settlement efficiency

  • 29 November, 2023

“The alternative is and remains mandatory buy-ins”

  • 17 October, 2023

At the banks, post trade means more and more for business

  • 14 September, 2023

Clearstream analysis: T2S yet to realise full potential

  • 13 July, 2023

Settlement efficiency still not good enough, finds ECB report

  • 9 June, 2023

European settlement rates improved a lot, after all

  • 16 February, 2023

British committee finds CSDR fines surprisingly large and bulky

  • 1 February, 2023

T+1: Bide your time or time to act?

  • 21 January, 2023

ESMA relieves CCPs of the task to collect settlement-fail penalties

  • 25 November, 2022

So when will we be considered disciplined enough?

  • 10 November, 2022

The T+1 drama: No time to fail

  • 17 October, 2022

Settlement efficiency is getting worse, not better

  • 10 October, 2022

Mandatory buy-ins? “Well, that depends on you”

  • 27 September, 2022

CSDR penalties roll in – but is the market working better?

  • 20 September, 2022

ECB on the mandatory buy-ins: Yeah, scrap ’em

  • 4 August, 2022

On settlement fail penalties, rates improve but ride is still bumpy

  • 29 March, 2022

Priority: Cut the EU’s “over-reliance” on UK-based clearing

  • 29 March, 2022

8 weeks with the penalties – Get your free digital ticket to meet the full range of stakeholders on 29 March

  • 22 March, 2022

Plan for CSDR buy-ins drastically cut in new EU proposal

  • 18 March, 2022
Older Posts