Settling US securities already the on the same day as the trade would not make sense. This is concluded by the CEO of industry heavyweight Sifma – the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association – based on an investigation of market participant views.

In team with central securities depository DTCC, and the Investment Company Institute (ICI), Sifma forms a part of the power force behind the plan to move US equities settlement to a T+1 cycle – settling trades the day after the trade, instead of two days after as is done today. However, to shorten the settlement cycle further than that wouldn’t be a positive thing, its CEO Kenneth Bentsen reckons.

“After a great deal of analysis by a broad cross section of industry participants, we concluded that moving to T+0 or end of day would require fundamental and costly changes in market operations affecting institutional and retail customers and actually increase risk,” the association writes.

Advertisement
PostTrade 360 Nordic 2024

Kenneth Bentsen’s article gives a long list of areas that could be touched by negative effects from a move to T+0, such as securities processing needing to be reengineered, securities netting, funding requirements, and impact on retail investors.