Latest news

—-

Menu

AFME’s operational conference puts real-life examples in spotlight

  • 17 October, 2023

AFME study: Use of AI in compliance is a double-edged sword

  • 5 October, 2023

At the banks, post trade means more and more for business

  • 14 September, 2023

AFME: Cost is not everything in investment strategy

  • 6 September, 2023

AFME “regrets” MiFIR review outcome

  • 10 July, 2023

The Council and Parliament reach agreement on CSDR update

  • 28 June, 2023

Trade associations: Do not “concede to suboptimal outcomes in MiFIR review”

  • 28 June, 2023

AFME: Due diligence in securitisation “the source of many uncertainties”

  • 20 June, 2023

AFME sets up industry taskforce on European T+1

  • 2 March, 2023

US sets tough May 2024 live date for T+1

  • 17 February, 2023

Market players applaud EU Council MiFIR/MiFID agreement (… mostly)

  • 30 December, 2022

CCP owners could be made to pay more upon blow-ups

  • 24 October, 2022

ESG data is on a good track … inching forward

  • 28 September, 2022

Mandatory buy-ins? “Well, that depends on you”

  • 27 September, 2022

Poor bond liquidity raises worry over EU drive for quick publication

  • 9 August, 2022

AFME to EU: Don’t obstruct the “systemic internalisers”

  • 23 February, 2022

Europe saw securitisation come back strong in Q4

  • 2 February, 2022

Industry stops buy-in preparations after ESMA’s don’t-bother

  • 3 January, 2022

Industry urges EU to keep accepting UK CCPs

  • 22 September, 2021

AFME: Grow securitisation to boost the recovery after covid

  • 3 August, 2021

Industry welcomes U-turn on buy-ins

  • 17 July, 2021
Older Posts Newer Posts: